To make sure that the consumer gets the best coverage, it is important to learn some tips about buying medical insurance in Virginia. Let’s have a look at them:

1. Glean quotes

To analyze what type of medical plans are available and how worthy budget needs to be spent in order to get a required level of coverage, the consumers should ask for health insurance quotes from various insurance companies. In fact, there are platforms that can provide health insurance quotes from various companies with minimal amount of personal information required. Getting health insurance quotes is easy and does not obligate the consumer to buy a health insurance policy.

2. Talking to an agent

Once the consumers get an notion or overview of the available health insurance plan, talking to an agent or a broker makes sense. Once again, consumers are not obligated to buy any particular health insurance policy. They should contact an independent health insurance agent, who represents the major carriers in Virginia, and discuss the options. It is not necessary that consumers should buy from the very first agent they meet in Virginia. There is nothing bad in trying multiple agents itself depending upon the time and availability that a consumer has.

3. Discuss

Consumers buying family health insurance or buying a health insurance policy the very first time should discuss and talk to their family members. Medical conditions, level of coverage, affordable budget and related issues should be discussed in detail to derive maximum optimization of the health insurance view.

4. Apply for the best plan

Once the discussion and talking has been done, the application procedure should be started with the chosen plan. With online technology available, it is easier to apply for a health insurance policy in Virginia. The agents don’t need to near to house to take your application—phone and email can help the purpose very amply.

5. Wait for the review process

Before an insurance company offers insurance, it reviews the application. Depending on the situation and to which company an application has been submitted, the review process could be 24 hours or more than 24 days. Once done, the company will speak the consumer about the date from which the coverage will become effective.

It is not easy to follow the steps because they read simple but are pretty difficult when executed practically due to time and planning the consumers need to do. But buying health insurance is not a casual activity or a sundry purchase. It requires attention and careful selection to make sure that the product is effective and beneficial.

Shaun mike writes extensively on health insurance topics for Virginians. His tips on how to buy health insurance Virginia are always read with great delight.

The dictionary defines cheap in two very distinctively different ways: costing little and worth little. Be sure you are looking for a product that is a good value, lower in price than you might reasonably expect. Where automobile insurance is the product, you do not want to be caught in the unfortunate end results of a bad decision, making an inexpensive and poor quality choice.

In this Internet age, searching for the cheapest auto insurance rates does not subject you to countless hours of high-pressure sales pitches from desperate insurance sales people just to derive a quote in hand. You can do one search engine query and you are on your device to a myriad of choices to compare.

But as you do this choice, keep in mind deductibles, liability limits, and any fine print regarding repair options in the event of a claim. If you are considering a firm outside your status, be mindful that area law varies on coverage requirements. If you choose to accept a higher deductible to save money on premiums, be sure you actually do have that distinguished cash available in the event of a claim. And, the state liability minimum coverage may not be enough.

To fully understand the importance of this, you might talk to someone who has been involved in an unfortunate accident where they were faulted with another person’s serious injuries and damages. Inquire about what are the cheapest auto insurance ratesin the event of something like that happening to you. An inadequate, cheap policy suddenly becomes a very expensive decision when you are faced with many thousands of dollars of damages and liability for which you are not covered.

In a time of globalization, it seems incongruous that nations and people are still oppressed. Basic human rights, detailed in the document, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, were adopted by the United Nations. One of those member nations appears to be guilty of violating it. The People’s Republic of China, or Communist China, holds the small nation of Tibet under its control. The people of Tibet have been crying out for liberation for many years and their cries go unanswered.

Brief history of the Tibetan struggle
Tibet has never been formally recognized as an independent county. Since the 13^th century, this nation has had loose ties with China, primarily because of its proximity. It was understood, however, that the Dalai Lama had authority over the Tibetans and was largely ignored unless a people group or nation wanted Tibet’s resources. In more recent history, in 1921 the Dalai Lama declared independence from China. It went ignored by China and in 1950, under military pressure, Tibet was forced to come back under the control of China. According to the 14^th Dalai Lama, “in order to develop Tibet materially as a modern nation, Tibet must remain within the People’s Republic of China. Provided Chinese give us a burly guarantee of preservation of Tibetan culture, Tibetan environment, Tibetan spirituality, then it is of mutual benefit.” He wanted full autonomy of the Tibetans in any area they could “manage by themselves.” (Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet)

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) notion that most of Tibetans lived as serfs, or slaves, to wealthy landowners and monasteries. In order to quell that, the PRC redistributed lands and caused a rebellion in 1959. The rebellion was supported by the CIA. Tens of thousands of Tibetans were killed in the uprising and the Dalai Lama had to flee to India.

Because of the rebellion, PRC exercised their authority over the small nation even stronger than before. Lands were redistributed. Claims of genocide surfaced. Tibetan culture was systematically being wiped out.

Protests in 2008
More protests flared up in 2008 and the PRC imposed severe curfews and strictly limited access to Tibetan areas. Protests against Chinese severity were held worldwide.

But to date, no country recognizes the Government of Tibet in Exile.

The unique Dalai Lama has been quoted in the South China Morning Post as saying, “We are willing to be part of the People’s Republic of China, to have it govern and guarantee to preserve our Tibetan culture, spirituality and our environment.” But he clarified the position as a governmental connection only. He wants total autonomy of the Tibetans in the areas of religious and cultural life. But if the PRC is not willing to grant some autonomy to Tibet, they will continue to fight for complete liberation.

Human Rights Violations
Tibet is the lowest ranked province in China for human rights violations (meaning they have the most violations) acccording to the UN’s Development Programme data. And Tibet ranks 153 out of 160 watched countries on the Human Development Index.

According to the Save Tibet website, these are a sampling of the human rights violations Tibetans have had to endure: self-determination, freedom of speech, assembly, movement, expression, and travel.

Since the ratification of the UN’s Convention Against Torture by China in 1988, 69 documented Tibetans died in Chinese prisons as a result of torture.

The PRC still asserts that Tibet has some autonomy in rule. However Tibetologist, Thomas Laird, maintains that there is no evidence to support that claim. He also states that the PRC continues to encourage resettlement of Chinese into Tibetan areas. This threatens the survival of Tibetan culture, identity and religious life. According to Wikipedia, “The Free Tibet website claims that unemployment in schools, discussion of Tibetan cultural, religious and social issues is discouraged, and Chinese culture is promoted.” (Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet)

Human Rights groups are not allowed to enter Tibet without a PRC escort and are never allowed to train to Tibetans without a member of the PRC delegation present. The PRC strictly controls access of any outsiders to Tibet.

On a more basic level, The Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy claims that unfair taxation has exacerbated the poverty in the already poor areas of Tibet. Housing, health care, and education are routinely denied. (http://www.tchrd.org/publications/annual_reports/1999/09_subsistence.html)

Boycotting the Olympics
People say that we should forget all the politics and focus on enjoying the games. Maybe that has merit. Should we, as freedom-loving Americans, attempt to forget those without the basic freedoms? We go to war to protect the rights of the oppressed. Are not the Tibetans among those people groups oppressed?

The People’s Republic of China have dark issues hanging over them as the Summer Olympics of 2008 begin.

More sources:
Laird, Thomas (2006). The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama, pp. 357-358. Grove Press, N.Y. ISBN 978-0-8021-827-1
http://www.tchrd.org/publications/annual_reports/1999/09_subsistence.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet

When visiting the company websites, search for current job openings with the keywords “telecommuting”, “remote”, “home”, and “virtual”. Note that not all these companies are hiring telecommuters or remote workers at the moment and vacancies change often.

Aetna Life Insurance – http://www.aetna.com
Allegiance Health Care- http://www.baxter.com
AG Communication – http://www.agcs.com
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. – http://www.airproducts.com
American Airlines – http://www.aa.com
American Express – http://www.americanexpress.com
Ameritech – http://www.ameritech.com
Allergan – http://www.allergan.com
Allstate Insurance – http://www.allstate.com
Apple Computer – http://www.apple.com
Arbitron Ratings Inc. – http://www.arbitron.com/jobs/home.htm
Art & Logic – http://www.artlogic.com
AT&T – http://www.att.com/employment/cpa.html
Bank of America – http://www.bofa.com/batoday/batoday.html
Banker’s Trust – http://www.bankerstrust.com
Baxter Healthcare – http://www.baxter.com
Bell South – http://www.bellsouth.com
Beneficial Corporation – http://www.beneficial.com
Berlitz Translation Services – http://www.berlitz.com
Blue Cross/Blue Shield – http://www.bluecross.com
CFW Communications – http://www.cfw.com
Chevron – http://www.chevron.com
CIGNA – http://www.cigna.com
Cincinnati Bell – http://www.cinbelltel.com
CISCO Systems, Inc. – http://www.cisco.com
Citibank – http://www.citibank.com
Compaq Computer Corporation – http://www.compaq.com
Computer Curriculum Corp. – http://www.cccnet.com (Email: jobs@cccnet.com)
Connext Inc. – http://www.connext.com
Creative Freelance -http://www.freelancers.com
Creative Labs – http://www.soundblaster.com – Engineers.
Creative Freelancers- http://www.freelancers.com/

Dell Computer – http://www.dell.com
Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. – http://www.diamondmm.com – Software engineers, technical support, marketing and sales.
Digital Equipment Corporation – http://www.digital.com
Digital News – http://www.digitalnews.com
Digital Origin Inc.- http://www.digitalorigin.com
DSP TEchnology, Inc. – http://www.dspt.com – Software and application engineers.
DuPont – http://www.dupont.com
Ernest & Young, L.L.P. – http://www.ey.com
Eastman Kodak Company – http://www.kodak.com
EasyCom – http://www.easycom.com
Edify Corp. – http://www.edify.com -
Electronics for Imaging, Inc. – http://www.efi.com – Web developers and QA.
En Pointe Technologies – http://www.enpointe.com – Sales staff.
Equitable Life Assurance – http://www.equitable.com
Fannie Mae – http://www.fanniemae.com
Farallon Computing – http://www.farallon.com
The Federal Government – http://www.jobsingovernment.com

Gannett – http://www.gannett.com
GEICO – http://www.geico.com – They offer telecommuting and other flexible schedules.
General Electic Nuclear Energy – http://www.ge.com – Primarily looking for Engineers.
GTE – http://www.gte.com
GE Plastics- http://www.ge.com
Globalink Language Services http://www.lhsl.com/jobs/
Gymboree Corp. – Job Hotline 1-800-222-7758.
Hewlett-Packard – http://www.hp.com Software and hardware design engineers, manufacturing engineers, product marketing, sales development, finance and human resource professionals.
Hello Deny, Inc. – http://www.hello-direct.com
Honeywell – http://www.honeywell.com
Hughes Aircraft – http://www.hughes.com
Hypermedia Group, Inc. – http://www.hmg.com
IBM – http://www.ibm.com – programmers, user-centered design programmers, technical and customer service support., IBM also uses the services of contractors on a regular basis.
Inktomi Corp. – http://www.inktomi.com – Computer engineers.
Inprise – formerly Borland Inc.
/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm? area http://www.inprise.com/about/
Insignia Solutions, Inc. – http://www.insignia.com – Technical support, sales and customer service.
Intel – http://www.intel.com – Engineers.
Intellicorp, Inc. – http://www.intellicorp.com – SAP consultants.
Interactive Systems – http://www.interactivesystems.com
Intracorp – http://www.intracorp.com

JCPenney – http://www.jcpenney.com
Jet Propulsion Laboratory – http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/hrext/employment/
John Hancock Insurance – http://www.johnhancock.com
Johnson & Company – http://joandco.com/about/helpWanted.html
Journal Graphics – http://www.journalgraphics.com/Jobs/Current.htm
Knight-Ridder Information, Inc. – http://www.krinfo.com -
San Jose Mercury News – http://www.sjmercury.com -
LAM Research Corp. – http://www.lamrc.com -
Lanier Worldwide Inc.- http://www.lanier.com
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory – http://www.llnl.gov – Computer engineers and optical electrical engineers.
LINK Resources Corporation – http://www.linkresources.com
Lucent Technologies- http://www.lucent.com/work/culture.html
Lumisys, Inc. – http://www.lumisys.com

Macromedia Inc. – http://www.macromedia.com
MacWEEK – http://www.zdnet.com
Maxtor Corp. – http://www.maxtor.com
McGraw Hill – http://www.mcgraw-hill.com
Meridian Data, Inc. – http://www.meridian-data.com
Merrill Lynch – http://www.ml.com/
Microsoft Corp. – http://www.microsoft.com
Molecular Devices Corp. – http://www.moldev.com
National Association of Insurance Commissioners – http://www.naic.com -
NEC Electronics, Inc. – http://www.nec.com – Telecommuting program handled on a case by case basis.
Netframe Systems, Inc. – http://www.netframe.com – They are looking for hardware and software engineers.
Netscape Communications Corp. – http://www.netscape.com The jobs hotline is 1-415-937-2783.
NewsBank – http://www.newsbank.com/
Newsbytes News Service – http://www.newsbytes.com/
Nike – http://www.nike.com
Nortel (Northern Telecom) – http://www.nortel.com/
Oacis Healthcare Systems – http://www.oacis.com – They are looking for
software development, clinical system and applications engineers.
Oak Technology, Inc. – http://www.oaktech.com – IC design and software
engineers.
Octel Communications Corp. – http://www.octel.com
Oracle Corp. – http://www.oracle.com
The Olsten Corporation – http://www.olsten.com/employ/index.html
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical http://www.oracle.com

Pacific Bell – http://www.sbc.com
PC Week – http://www.zdnet.com
Peoplesoft, Inc. – http://www.peoplesoft.com – Software developers, support, consulting and trainers
Prime Computer Systems: http://www.primecomputer.net
Philips C&P Division – http://www.philips.com
Quantum Corp. – http://www.quantum.com
Quintus Corp. – http://www.quintus.com – Looking for quality assurance
engineers, professional services consultants and technical support engineers.
Radius, Inc. – http://www.radius.com
The RAND Corporation: http://www.rand.com/careers/
Raytheon Systems – http://www.raytheon.com/rsc -
Remedy Corp. – http://www.remedy.com
Rockwell International Corporation – http://www.rockwell.com/jobs

Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. – http://www.sco.com
Sears, Roebuck & Co. – http://www.sears.com
The Seattle Times- http://www.seattletimes.com/
SEEQ Technology, Inc. – http://www.seeq.com -
Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc. – http://www.siemens.com -
Sprint – http://www.trudge.com
Sun Microsystems – http://www.sun.com
Symantec Corp. – http://www.symantec.com
Tab Products Co. – http://www.tabproducts.com
Texas Instruments – http://www.ti.com
UMI/Data Courier – http://www.umi.com
Unigroup Inc. – http://www.unigroup.com
United Press International – http://www.upi.com

Vanstar Corporation – www.skillnet.skillset.com/inacom
Verifone, Inc. – http://www.verifone.com
Verizon formerly Bell Atlantic – http://www.verizon.com
VirtualStaff – http://www.virtualstaff.com
Xerox – http://www.zerox.com
Xyratex- http://www.xyratex.com
Zitel Corp. – http://www.zitel.com

Thesis
Despite being the largest trade partner to its mega-neighbor to the south, the United States (McLaughlin), Canada has gotten the short end of many of the larger trade agreements that have emerged in current years. In contrast, however, the North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA, has lived up to its promises to Canada that were made when the agreement was first authored in the 1990s (Howell). In an effort to gain some rights and benefits in the international trade agreements that have come to fruition over the past several decades, Canada, among other nations, has taken protectionist steps to preserve their own best interests, lest they be pressured by unfair trade reform.

Antithesis
Origins of the Antithesis
For the sake of balanced and just research, the researcher will also put forth an antithesis and offer relevant documentation to show the essential flaws in that antithesis. Simply put, the antithesis that will be represented in this paper is that protectionist trade policy only serves to isolate the nations that enact them, and in the long run, actually hurt those countries more than help them. Briefly stated here, as an entrée to the bulk of the research, suffice it to say that there is an undercurrent in Canada that strictly opposes the protectionist trade policies that have been advocated because they limit the opportunities for many companies to offer their goods and services to a wide range of potential customers (Molot). In a sense, there is a feeling in the business arena of Canada that there is such a thing as too worthy protection, which ultimately serves to not only protect to a certain level, but also to suppress economic activity to the point where the protection causes more harm than good. As a closing thought to the antithesis, and transitioning into the subsequent portions of this paper, it must be understood that every effort will be made within this research to objectively present the facts of the matters discussed, clearly separate fact from belief or theory, and of course give reliable citation when the works of others are cited within the pages of the paper. By utilizing the information and works of others, an informative blend of quality research will unfold. With these parameters in mind, the research will now continue within the scope of the thesis and antithesis that have been previously identified and presented.

Personal Views: Canadian Trade in Modern Times
Before any personal views can be integrated into this paper, and before any valid conclusions can be presented, it is important to understand the modern history of Canadian trade policy. In the modern era of international trade (previously identified as the period of the 1960′s and forward), Canada has made an inconvenience to become a global force in terms of trade and commerce, challenging in major trade agreements and the like. One of the most significant of these is the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement (CUFTA), signed in 1989 in order to foster an effective and mutually profitable arrangement between these North American neighbors (Martin, et al). Without a doubt, CUFTA has been very successful for Canada, resulting in hundreds of billions of dollars in business for a wide variety of goods and services, the most vital of which is the automotive industry, whereby Canadian components are used in American cars, and vice versa. However, the tremendous gains of CUFTA have unfortunately made up the bulk of Canada’s trade revenue. In other words, the trade that has been engaged with nations other than the United States has not been exactly fruitful. Entering into trade agreements in good faith, Canada has not received benefits commensurate with the exertion and concessions the nation has put forward in the pursuit of free and equitable trade.

Canada’s Benefit and Lack Thereof from NAFTA
Another example of Canada’s terrible experience with organized, so called “free” trade agreements is the stumbling blocks that Canada hit with the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA. Originally born in the 1990′s, the agreement was designed to benefit the United States, Canada, and Mexico by facilitating free and frequent trade among these nations without the restrictions of tariffs, border disputes, and protectionist measures (Foreign Policy). This agreement is said to produce 1 billion to 3 billion dollar gains in each country. NAFTA ensures that a certain amount of goods produced and traded between the three countries has to have a minimum percentage of its parts produced in North America. The Free Trade agreement is between the United States and Canada. The Free trade agreement came into effect in 1989 even though three fourths of trade between Canada and the United States was already free (Mcdougall). This agreement to Canada is huge because it set up a free trade zone between the U.S and Canada, which is the largest free trade zone in the world. The Free Trade agreement is huge to Canada because 20 per cent of Canada’s GDP comes from exports to the United States. This agreement eliminated all trade restrictions such as tariffs, quotas, and non tariff barriers. The Canadian economy gains access to the U.S economy that is ten times its size (Greenberg). Canadian Goals in NAFTA Canada’s goals in the negotiation of NAFTA were very simple. They wanted to improve their access for their goods and services to Mexico and the United States. Canada wanted to guarantee their position as a prime location for investors seeking to serve all of North America. The NAFTA deal has realized these objectives space by Canada and will supply Canada with a new and sharper edge to their international competitiveness. The agreement has set a path for Canada widening their trade horizons, while also giving them a bigger stage on which to demonstrate their economic expertise and leadership. Canadian-Mexican Benefit An advantage for Canada is that the reduction of Mexican barriers will provide new markets and opportunities for Canadian goods and services. Canadian firms will be able to participate in, and expand sales in, sectors that were previously highly restricted, such as autos, financial services, trucking, energy and fisheries. Mexican tariffs and import licensing requirements will be eliminated, some immediately and others over 5 to 10 years, providing barrier free access to 85 million consumers (Storer). The North American Free Trade Agreement covers virtually every field of business in Canada. NAFTA provides many provisions as well as both real and potential advantages to Canadians in all most all places in the work place. Agriculture products play a considerable role in Canada’s exports to other countries. Canada’s suited and fertile farming land has produced many titanic results. A very obedient livestock and excellent crops have contributed to a productive and prosperous trade of their agricultural products and services around the world. Canada’s total exports surpasses $13 billion a year (Gruen). Under NAFTA Canada and Mexico have worked out a separate agreement between themselves. Overall Canadian exports will bask in immediate access to the Mexican market under the deal. Mexican import licenses on wheat, barley and table potatoes will be eliminated over a period of time. Also tariffs on lentils, honey, dried peas, millet, raspberries, rye and buckwheat will be dropped. All these items are important crops to Canadian farmers and with these costs cut they will enjoy a greater profit and more trade. NAFTA also opens up broad opportunities for livestock farmers. Because Mexico lacks an adequate fresh water supply their livestock operations aren’t very big. Therefore Mexico must rely on imports from Canada. NAFTA helps Canadian farmers and farm related businesses to a considerable greater ease to an ever growing market that will benefit them in the future. There are well over 140,000 Canadians employed in the auto manufacturing Industry. As well, approximately 32 per cent of Canada’s manufacturing exports is directly related to the auto industry (Taylor). The Mexican market however, is highly restricted, while 95 per cent of Mexican automotive imports enter Canada completely duty free. NAFTA addresses this imbalance, and more importantly corrects it. By the year 2013, Canada will have open access to the fastest growing automotive market in North America. Canadian Service Industries and NAFTA Canada’s service industry is the fastest growing sector of its economy. More than nine million Canadians, which is about two thirds of their work force, are employed by the service sector. Cross border trade in services was dealt with for the first time in the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. The NAFTA deal has included provisions for this type of trade and spells out procedures aimed at encouraging the recognition of licenses and certificates through the development of mutually acceptable professional standards and criteria such as education, experience and professional development. Under NAFTA a temporary entry across the border will be available for about 60 professions. Oceanographers, geographers and statisticians are three groups who can abet from the NAFTA agreement.

Canadian Financial Markets and NAFTA
More than 500,000 Canadians are employed in the “four pillars” of the financial industry. These pillars consist of banking, insurance, securities firms and trust companies. Mexico’s financial markets have opened up for Canada due to the NAFTA deal. Canadian banking, insurance, and security firms will be able to operate wholly owned subsidies that will allow Canadian businesses to service their clients throughout the NAFTA region. Canada’s financial sector, which is already strong and hearty, will realize new opportunities under NAFTA that will allow it to further expand and flourish. Canada’s financial institutions have a lot to offer Mexico. Canada’s strength, such as its technological know- how and it’s experience in operating large, integrated banking networks, are areas in which Mexico needs immediate and consistent strategic advice. Foreign investment has played an important role in Canada’s development as a nation. Investment is an indispensable tool for Canada’s growth and prosperity. It will continue to aid Canada’s goal of maintaining and enhancing their competitiveness in the world marketplace. Under the free trade agreement with the U.S., Canada agreed to raise the thresholds for the review of foreign takeovers by U.S. investors. With NAFTA Mexico will enjoy the same access as the U.S. investors. Canada has reserved its suitable to review large foreign takeovers. In addition, the NAFTA allows Canada to continue safeguarding key factors like culture, social services, basic telecommunications and some modes of transportation by permitting Canada to maintain restrictions on foreign participation. Canadian Telecommunications and NAFTA Telecommunications is definitely going to play a crucial role in integrating the North American economy under NAFTA. A smooth transfer of data and the instantaneous electronic exchange of information via telecommunications networks are an essential tool of international trade. This will benefit Canada; for they are a recognized world leader in the telecommunications field. This will directly provide a market for Canadian developers in services such as electronic messaging, advanced data networks, and electronic mail. Mexico is in the process of modernizing its services so that they are compatible with Canadian and U.S. networks. By the year 2010, Mexico’s question for imported telecommunications products is expected to grow by 42 per cent (Taylor). Anyone can plainly see the potential opportunities here for Canada. Transportation in Canada and NAFTA The North American Free Trade Agreement has “streamlined” transportation between the three countries involved. Within six years, trucks and buses can crisscross the North American continent with virtually no border restrictions. Under NAFTA, for instance, a Canadian driver can take a load from Calgary, to Mexico city, with a stop in Texas for more goods. And on the arrangement home, the same driver can deliver Mexican goods to both Canadian and U.S. destinations. NAFTA Caveats It should be noted, in all fairness however, that the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement may have many negative connotations towards social and environmental issues enthralling the trading nations. One effect from the enactment of NAFTA is the loss of manufacturing jobs which would occur from the shift of multinational corporations to Mexico. This will cause many corporations to move their plants over the border. By doing this, it will let them produce goods at lower costs. This is because Mexico has cheaper, unskilled labor due to non-existent minimum wage rates. In almost every case money usually leads the way. The problems that the US and Mexico have encountered since embarking on NAFTA are a lesson that Canada is better off for not having been fervent in this agreement at all. What can be said is that trade agreements are a double edged sword that must be carefully evaluated before being musty. Having shown examples of trade agreements gone bad, and more specifically Canada’s poor experiences with trade agreements, the thesis that supports the exercise of protectionist policy will now be explored in greater detail, first considering what protectionism represents and its suitability as a protection against the sometimes crushing weight of the trade agreements that often pit large and small nations against one another in an disaster to do them equal, when evidence suggests that the smaller nations frequently end up being taken advantage of or worse off than they were when they entered into the trade agreements in the first place.

Protectionism Defined
Protectionism, in the context of this paper, of course refers to the protection of a nation’s financial interests from the intrusion of foreign competition, which usually invades the borders of a given country under the guise of trade agreements, which ostensibly attempt to provide a level playing field for those who are engaged in the trade. By installing a protectionist policy into the laws of a given nation, that nation can be protected from the disadvantage of other countries claiming a piece of the economy. Different Types of Protectionist Measures Protectionism, within the realm of protecting the economic interests of a given nation, do not have as powerful to do with physically sealing the borders of a given country, but rather trying to stem the tide of foreign goods that are entering the country and taking away revenue and jobs from the home nation itself. Some measures that have been undertaken as protectionist measures in the past include tariffs, which charge other nations a tax for importing their goods into a given country, limits on imports, which of course restrict the entry of foreign goods into a given country, and embargoes, which totally ban foreign goods. Embargoes are typically employed between nations when the given nations are at war or some type of a heated dispute. Specific Protectionism in Canada Despite the complaints of such giant global trade forces as the World Trade Organization, Canada has made attempts to protect its own interests by implementing specific protectionist measures that are aimed at preventing huge losses to foreign competitors. Over the years, Canadian tariffs and restrictions have protected their interest to a certain extent. Canada is certainly justified in utilizing protectionist measures, and at least in the case of Canada, it can be said that the nation wears protectionism on its sleeve. For decades, the WTO has been accused of using back room protectionist moves to support its largest members such as China (Cuddy), thereby showing that there is a basis for the argument in favor of protectionism even among the largest players in the global trade game.

What Happens Without Protectionism?
A compelling argument for the use of protectionism lies in the story of what has happened in the United States, Canada’s largest trade partner and powerful neighbor, from the overuse of free trade agreements and policies. Consider these two real life examples of problems that the United States has encountered for the sake of free trade: 1. Over the next three years, a major New York securities firm plans to replace its team of 800 American software engineers, who each earns about $150,000 per year, with an equally competent team in India earning an average of only $20,000. 2. Within five years the number of radiologists in this country is expected to decline significantly because M.R.I. data can be sent over the Internet to Asian radiologists capable of diagnosing the problem at a limited fraction of the cost (Scuhmer). What conclusions can we gather from these examples? First of all, the fact that a mega nation like the United States has seen such an invasion is remarkable and sunless at the same time. There are several reasons for the predicament of foreign invasion from an economic standpoint; first of all, the proliferation of education throughout the world, as well as the fact that nations such as the United States have opened their borders to people from other countries for educational purposes. Once those individuals have received an education, they are willing to collect their professional reputation by working for wages that are much lower than their competing counterparts; moreover, in those nations, many times the standard of living and prevailing wages are much lower; therefore, the workers can beget a given job at a lower rate than someone in a more developed nation. Going back to the examples that were cited previously, what occurred was a sort of exporting situation, albeit a location where labor and services, and ultimately jobs, were exported to another country. When this occurs, the nation that loses the jobs of course loses just a little bit more economic freedom in the form of lower living standards due to unemployed or displaced workers, the loss of tax revenue for the government and of course the loss of the buying power within the country that the wages would have produced domestically. The bottom line is that whether a physical good is coming from a given country at the expense of another country, or in this case, as jobs bleed from the country, a tall deal of damage is done. At the risk of an excessive quote, this statement from Schumer says it all: “if the case for free trade is undermined by changes in the global economy, our policies should reflect the new realities. While some economists and elected officials suggest that all we need is a robust retraining effort for laid-off workers, we do not believe retraining alone is an answer, because almost the entire range of “knowledge jobs” can be done overseas. We do not believe that offering tax breaks can compensate for the enormous wage differentials driving jobs offshore”. The exiting of jobs from nations must not be allowed to occur, which is a caution that must be stressed within the scope of trade agreements.

Where Does Canada Stand on Immigration?
Where Canada stands on the policy of immigration also plays a key role in the protection of domestic financial interests. Throughout its history Canada has maintained numerous immigration policies, many not surviving the life span of the government under which they were created. In 1976 Canada adopted a points-based system, where potential immigrants were assigned various points based on such things as age, education, and secure worth. This system was designed to prevent immigrants from being barred entry into the country based on race, religion, or creed. Essentially, those immigrants with sufficiently large personal savings, or with jobs skills listed under the government’s General Occupations List, would be awarded more points, thus increasing there chance of being granted admittance into the country. Of all the immigrants coming to Canada, most fall under the skilled worker category. These are immigrants who posses work skills which are deemed wanted by the Canadian government’s National Occupational Classification. Such skills often include technical skills, in the fields of science and medicine, but also quite frequently labor skills, to fill labor gaps that the current Canadian population either cannot or is unwilling to fill. It has always been the current Liberal government’s policy to limit immigration to Canada to 1% of the current population (Pettigrew), but does this hold in practice? The Canadian government needs to adopt a system of quotas which it is both willing to support and enforce, since the Liberal’s do not appear to be enforcing their one-percent philosophy. The Reform Party of Canada has suggested in their Blue Sheet that immigration levels should be established at a maximum of 150,000 (for all immigrant groups. A figure slightly less then the Liberal 1%) per year in any year where the unemployment rate exceeds 10%, with increases in immigration as the unemployment rate falls below 10%. Such a system would be more reasonable than the Liberal’s one percent, since it would ensure that in times of high unemployment that the potential exists for Canadians to procure any new jobs, as opposed to them possibly being filled by cheaper immigrant labor. It also takes into account the fact that Canada may not need so many skilled worker immigrants, since it already has a sufficiently stout skilled workforce already in plot. To allow so many immigrants in without a scheme similar to that of the Reform Party’s may in fact be causing the increase in unemployment. Yet, like the Liberal philosophy, this policy would require a system to prevent the quota from being exceeded. A simple policy would simply stop accepting immigration applications once the quota has been reached. Any immigrants turned down after this point could always reapply in the following year.

Entrepreneurs from Other Countries in Canada
The “Entrepreneur” is required to make a substantial investment in a business in Canada that will make a vital contribution to the economy. The business must get or continue at least one job in Canada for a Canadian citizen or permanent resident other than the entrepreneur and dependants. The applicant must also intend and have the ability to provide active and ongoing participation in the management of the business (Drover, et al). One of the other larger groups admitted into Canada are sponsored immigrants. Sponsored immigrants are essentially those who have family already in Canada and can come by those family member’s to sponsor their immigration application. The Liberal government encourages family relations and development, as it sees family and family life as a necessary facet of an immigrant integrating into Canadian society. With this goal in mind, the current government encourages immigrants to sponsor their family members, provided those members meet the same health and security restrictions applied to all other immigrants. Statistically, the number of sponsored immigrants arriving in Canada has gradually declined in proportion to the number of immigrants arriving in Canada, to the point where the number actually arriving rarely reaches the maximum number of sponsored immigrants planned for by the government. Yet despite this proportionate decline, the number of sponsored immigrants arriving is still significantly high. Refugees in Canada’s Economy The other group of immigrants frequently admitted into Canada, and the ones that receive most of the media attention, are refugees. Since World War II, Canada has resettled or granted asylum to over 800,000 refugees and other people in need of humanitarian solutions. It was originally stated that immigration has always played an well-known role in Canada’s history, and it should continue to do so. But immigration must be limited to those who possess the human capital necessary to adjust quickly and independently to the needs of Canadian society and the job market. Canada should strengthen their restrictions on immigration by providing a stricter and more effective way of filtering out security or medical threats, by enacting the novel proposals to ensure that potential immigrants are fluent in either of the official languages, and that they have a needed occupation according to the National Occupational Classification. Canada should also provide better training for visa officers abroad in order that they may better assess an applicant’s eligibility for immigration. Other restrictions Canada should impose include a much tighter and enforced quota system for skilled worker immigrants, based on Canada’s modern employment needs, they should encourage business immigrate immigration, and they should limit who an immigrant can sponsor for similar immigration. As for refugees, Canada must adopt a policy more consistent and similar to that of the United Nation’s, a policy that can much better determine which refugee applications are legitimate, and which are not. It should also guarantee that all refugees have the potential to quickly integrate themselves into the workforce so that they may become economically independent. All of these proposals are for the economic and social benefit of Canada and Canadians. Although immigration is a vital role in our development, we must also ensure that Canada puts Canadians first, and ensures that immigration will not adversely affect the existing economic system, by either causing increased unemployment, and/or increased use of social programs. The immigrants Canada accepts should be those with the best potential to adapt to our society and become independent, and those with the best potential to give something back in return. Antithesis In support of the thesis, the researcher now offers the antithesis that protectionist trade policy may isolate nations to the point of starvation, rather than protecting them overall from adverse competition and foreign undercutting. From the standpoint of a mega nation like the United States, Free trade is enormous by creating new jobs and making the U.S. the global leader in economy. Whereas, Switzerland refused to join the European Economic Area (EEA) for personal reasons. It should also be noted that “free trade” can cause a loss of sovereignty, protection of a nation’s resources, etc. The view that international trade can facilitate economic growth by expanding the size of the market is as old as the economics profession itself, tracing back to Adam Smith’s 1776 discourse on the gains from specialization of trade (Summers). Nevertheless, along with the idea of international trade, another concept of commerce runs called protectionism. A century and a half ago French economist and statesman Frederic Bastiat presented the practical case for free trade: “It is always beneficial,”’ he said, “for a nation to specialize in what it can produce best and then trade with others to acquire goods at costs lower than it would take to produce them at home” (Barton). A case for protectionism must also be remembered when 1977 AFL-CIO President, George Meany said, “Free trade is a chronicle. Foreign countries subsidize their manufacturers, which enables them to undercut United States companies and take the jobs of American workers … This is not competition – it is a stacked deck, stacked against the American worker … If we pursue the policies that have gone on for the last few years, we’re going to be a completely service nation” (Gray, et al). Many advocators of protectionism are always willing to claim that free trade is a myth. Those who search for these and other fallacies of free trade often turn to the economic theory of protectionism for answers. In short, protectionism can be defined as a system of policies and devices created by governments in order to acquire or preserve domestic industries by protecting them from foreign competition, usually through duties imposed on importations. The theory of protectionism, similarly to that of free trade, has many strengths and weaknesses that must be examined and weighed carefully in order to determine the best economic trade policy.

Should Canada Keep its Money at Home?
If Canada wishes to retain its status, it must keep its money at home in domestic industries instead of supporting foreign firms. Trading with countries that violate human rights will only strengthen and support their industries. They must instead support domestic firms to keep the money and power in their own country. However, this concept can pain the national economy also. If a country does not spend money on imports, they will not be able to export goods to countries that would otherwise patronize the merchandise. Also, through buying imports, a country or industry will give up an intangible asset (money) in order to gain tangible assets (imported goods) that they can use and profit from (Crookell). Another argument for protectionism is that this economic system will not only protect key industries but more-so safeguard developing infant industries. Protectionism is especially strategically effective today for many developing countries. The key to national power is manufacturing. When industries are in developmental stages of production, their prices may be higher due to additional costs for initial investment. Protectionism will give these firms an equal field instead of trying to compete with already developed companies. Soon the infant industries will be able to raise their productivity rate so they can lower their prices but they must have protection until they can get off the ground. On the other hand, this case cannot always be used to support protectionism. Adam Smith argued that, although this case is the only kindly argument for tariffs, a more efficient way to retract care of this problem is through government subsidies. This way the infant industries will be put on a level trading field with large foreign companies and will still allow free trade to flourish in the global economy. One final argument to serve protectionism is it can establish Canadian jobs. Whenever a cutback in production for an industry is made, some workers must lose their job and unemployment increases. According to the general supply and quiz theory of economics, cutbacks in production occur when the product made is not in as great of demand. If consumers lift foreign goods because their prices are lower to due government subsidies, Canadian companies will suffer which eventually leads to the rise of unemployment in Canada. Economist Mehrene Larudee reminds us that, “In a primitive system, perhaps people would spread the work and enjoy more free time. But not in the contemporary world of the 9-to-5 job” (Sam). In addition, placing tariffs on foreign goods cause foreigners to put their own tariffs on Canadian goods so net exports are not respectable. Free Trade? In the past decade, free trade has become more and more an integral concept with globalization and world trade. Free trade can be defined as international trade free from governmental restrictions or protective duties and subject only to such tariffs as are needed for revenue. The world free trade allows producers to assign their product on the market in direct competition with other producers and allows consumers to buy any product they so choose. Supporters of free trade argue that protectionism is especially corrupt in the late 1990′s. Free trade benefits include increased domestic competition and thus lower domestic product prices. In a free market, consumers can assume the best product at the lowest price, which puts the burden of true competition on each industry. Buchanan treats the free trade process mainly as a zero-sum game: one country’s gain is another country’s loss. If this were true, there would not be much global trade and investment. When losers recognized their losses, they would withdraw from the market. What is true, of course, is that individual companies or individual workers can lose in trade. But what is bad for a company or an industry is not necessarily unpleasant for a country. Many countries now gain and trade the same things. Japan makes and trades cars, computer chips, and telephone switching centers; and so do the United States and Germany. The result is bigger markets that enable efficient producers to achieve greater economies of scale by spreading costs across more buyers. This allows prices to consumers to drop. Boeing, Microsoft, and Caterpillar all have lower unit costs because they are selling to a world market. Domestic competition also intensifies because imports compel domestic rivals to improve. Chevrolets and Chryslers are now better and more efficiently made because Americans can buy Toyotas and Hondas. In many industries American firms and workers have had to adapt to the best foreign practices and technologies.

Economic Patriotism
Although patriotism can be an important aspect to the success of any nation, the world is becoming more globally aware so a new economic system must comply with this sense of globalization. In a modern-day world society, government-run economics are out of date and old-fashioned. The consumer should be free to patronize and buy any product they choose, whether it is for reasons of price, quality, or national pride. In a free market, consumers are still able to turn away from one industry to another in order to support their own domestic firms but there should not be restrictive laws eradicating other consumers’ rights to buy a product at the lowest price. In the end, free trade gives consumers the greatest consumption possibilities with lower product prices, a greater product variety, and increased industrial competition. Free trade puts the burden of economic competition where it belongs, on the industries, not on the patrons of the world. In the post-9/11 world, even beyond the borders of America, there has been a huge push toward Economic Patriotism, which is to say that the people of nations are trying to purchase goods that are made within their gain borders in an worry to provide wealth and revenue within their own country, which they surmise will strengthen their country and make it less vulnerable to the threat of global terrorism (Cody). While this is true to a certain point, there are other, admittedly more creative scenarios that must be considered within the case of Economic Patriotism: • If other nations are impoverished due to trade imbalance, they may become unstable, adding to discontent in those countries, and fostering terrorism • Trade disputes could lead to terrorist acts in retaliation Taken with a grain of salt, admittedly, these scenarios must be considered in the big picture of international trade and restrictions.

Export Opportunities in Canada
In fairness, the possibility of viable export opportunities for Canada needs to be considered. It is feasible that Canada can be on the winning end of export agreements because of some of the unique natural resources the country possesses. importance of mining is definitely essential to Canada. As an ideal example, mining is an important industry, and Canadians are very advanced in their mining technology, but during the mining process, there is a sure level of pollution produced. The Canadian government and the mining companies have very good plans and controls toward this problem, while ensuring the smooth running of the industries, and also helping to create strong economy and employment. The world of today could not exist without mineral products. Canada produces about 60 minerals and ranks first among producing countries (Canada Magazine). In a typical year, the mining industry is responsible for a big fraction of Canada’s total export. Mining is very distinguished in Canadian life. Not only do the products power the family car and heat the family home, the manufacturing sector, the high tech industries and even the better known resource industries are all dependent, in some way, on the mining industry. The mining industry will continue to be an important support to the economy. Mining is taking full advantage of the lickety-split expansion of computers and microelectronics. These technologies are found in nearly every aspect of mineral development activity – from exploration methods, through production, mineral processing and even marketing. Computers and related equipment now have a lot of different applications in geophysical logging, geochemistry, geological mapping, etc. The above example is not to say that the entire nation of Canada should become a mine, but rather to execute an example that there are viable opportunities out there for Canada to expand exporting activities. Moreover, with smart planning and strategic relationships that are well planned, the country can explore new and better opportunities. Earlier portions of this paper detailed the advantages that Canada has in telecommunications, finance, and more. Using those as examples as well, of course, there is a substantial amount of evidence to suggest that Canada can step out of its acquire borders for opportunities in the world market. Entering Future Trade Agreements Within this paper, we have shown the advantages and disadvantages of trade agreements in general, as well as the good and the bad that Canada has gotten from involvement in various trade agreements. This leads us to the question of whether or not Canada should enter into trade agreements in the future. The question is not as easily answered as one might think. If nothing else, we have shown in this paper that given the complex nature of today’s world situation and economy, nothing is absolutely good or bad. Therefore, it is impossible to say that Canada should always or never take in trade agreements in the future. More appropriately, what we can say is that there are a few cautions that must be considered in general before entering into any recent agreements in the future: 1. Look at the big picture- while not all of the elements of the agreement may be ideal for Canada, there may be trade offs within the agreements that will allow Canada to give something in order to get something else. 2. Beware- Agreements are easy to enter and hard to leave….the stunning print must always be read in the agreements themselves. 3. Consider the strategic elements of the agreements-for example, homeland security is a key wretchedness in today’s world, so as an example, if Canada enters into an agreement with the United States, they will have an interest in protecting Canada from a dollars and cents standpoint. The point that is being made here is that trade agreements must be approached carefully and evaluated before being jumped into. Thesis or Antithesis? This research has certainly covered a great deal of material regarding Canada in terms of its domestic situation, international trade, immigration, industry, the war on scare, and much more. As the research began, there were a thesis and antithesis that were put forth with the blueprint of clearly proving the thesis and disproving the antithesis. Ironically enough, in the tradition of impartial research, the researcher has uncovered elements of both the thesis and antithesis that are proven and disprove, valid and invalid, given the complex details that this research ended up identifying. Therefore, what follows as a conclusion to this paper are a re-stating of the thesis and antithesis, as well as points under each statement which prove or disprove it, depending upon the case. In addition to merely proving or disproving them, recommendations will be made that will be useful either for future researchers or for the sake of simple argument. With this in mind, the research now comes full circle as follows:

Re-presentation of the Thesis
“Protectionist measures are appropriate for a given nation to protect their own interests in the realm of international trade, but not across the board” At the risk of sounding like a confusing mess, the thesis stands up in general; in other words, protectionist measures are appropriate some of the time, given a particular situation. Referring back to earlier portions of the paper, Canada has taken action to curb the flow of immigrants and imported goods into the country that would hurt the economic interests of the country as a whole; conversely, the U.S. has been afflict very badly in the occasions when free and open borders for people and product have been promoted. Therefore, nothing can be evaluated in an always or never category; rather, discretion must be taken to protect the interests of the nation of Canada without isolating it. Some possible steps for protectionism are as follows: • Restriction on imports and immigration • Tariffs to curb the flow of imports that are coming in • Lawful to refuse unfair trade agreements

Re-Presentation of Antithesis
“Protectionist trade policy only serves to isolate the nations that enact them, and in the long run, actually hurt those countries more than help them”. This antithesis has been disproved for several reasons; going attend to the conclusion that there are no absolutes in world trade, there are occasions, relating support to the thesis, where protectionist movements are necessary and beneficial. Therefore, these are some recommendations: • Protectionism should be kept as a viable option if needed to protect interests • Protectionism should not be confused with isolationism • There are no absolutes in Protectionism Final Thoughts As a final thought, the reader should realize that global trade is very dynamic, given the world situation in the current day, and nothing is guaranteed. Now more than ever, nations need to work together to enact their individual and group goals for the good of the nations, their people, and our planet.

Bibliography and Works Cited

“Agreement on Safeguards”. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1994) http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/25-safeg.pdf

Atkinson, Glen. “The Political Economy of Liberalization and Regulation: Trade Policy for the Unique Era.” Journal of Economic Issues 32.2 (1998): 419+.

Barton, Richard L. Ties That Blind in Canadian/American Relations: Politics of News Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990.

Bering, Helle. “Losing Faith in Trade.” The Washington Times 16 July 1998: 23. “Broken Promise of NAFTA.” The New York Times 6 January 2004.

“Canadian businesses tapping into South America’s economic powerhouses are finding rich rewards”. Canada World Plan 8. (2005) http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/canada-magazine/issue28/10-title-en.asp

Cody, Howard. “U.S.-Canada Trade, Defense and Border Issues since September 11: The Thought from Canada.” Canadian-American Public Policy (2003): 3+. “Consumers Speak out on Trade.” The Washington Times 14 Sept. 2003: B03.

Crookell, Harold. Canadian-American Trade and Investment under the Free Trade Agreement. New York: Quorum Books, 1990. Cuddy, Kevin J. “Crouching Tariffs, Hidden Protectionism.” Foreign Policy Jan.-Feb. 2003: 74+.

Deutsch, Klaus Günter, and Bernhard Speyer, eds. The World Trade Organization Millennium Round: Freer Trade in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge, 2001

Doran, Charles F., and Gregory P. Marchildon, eds. The NAFTA Puzzle: Political Parties and Trade in North America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.

Drover, Glenn, and K.K. Leung. “Nationalism and Trade Liberalization in Quebec and Taiwan.” Pacific Affairs 74.2 (2001): 205.

“Drug Death a Fear in Canada; Cheaper Prices Lure Americans.” The Washington Times 20 Oct. 2004: A01. Gray, Richard, and Mel Annand. “Grain Trade in Contemporary Canada-U.S. Relations.” American Review of Canadian Studies 28.3 (1998): 253-71.

Greenberg, Michael H. “Chapter 19 of the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement and the North American Free Trade Agreement: Implications for the Court of International Trade.” Law and Policy in International Business 25.1 (1993): 37-49.

Gruen, Nicholas. “Towards a More General Approach to Trade Liberalization.” Economic Record 75.231 (1999): 385. “Happily Ever NAFTA.” Foreign Policy Sept.-Oct. 2002: 58+. How Nations Grow Rich: The Case for Free Trade. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Howell, Llewellyn D. “Free Trade Agreement Mustn’t Ignore Canada.” USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education) May 1993: 51.

Johnson, Demcey. “U.S. Perspectives on Grain Trade with Canada: A Critical Appraisal.” American Review of Canadian Studies 28.3 (1998): 273-86. L.Anderson, James. The International Seafood Trade. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Woodhead Pub., 2003.

Martin, Larry, Vincent Amanor-Boadu, and Fiona Stirling. “Countervailing and Antidumping Actions: An Evaluation of Canada’s Experience with the United States.” American Review of Canadian Studies 28.3 (1998): 315-34.

Mcdougall, Allan K. “Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada.” American Review of Canadian Studies 34.3 (2004): 580+.

Mclaughlin, John. “Trade Winds from Canada.” National Review 30 Dec. 1988: 21. Bibliography and Works Cited Molot, Maureen Appel. “The Trade-Security Nexus: The New Reality in Canada-U.S. Economic Integration.” American Review of Canadian Studies 33.1 (2003): 27+.

O’Neill, Kate. “How Two Cows Make a Crisis: U.S.-Canada Trade Relations and Excited Cow Disease.” American Review of Canadian Studies 35.2 (2005): 295+.

Pal, Debashis, and Mark White. “Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization and Strategic Trade Policy.” Southern Economic Journal 65.2 (1998): 264+.

Pettigrew, Pierre. “Quebec City Lessons Arm WTO Nations for Post-Seattle Trade Talks.” Canadian Speeches May 2001: 24.

Pettigrew, Pierre. “Trade Talks: Reversing Seattle’s 1999 Failure, Solving Lumber Dispute.” Canadian Speeches Nov.-Dec. 2001: 57+.

“Protection.” The Columbia Encyclopedia. 6th ed. 2004.

“Razing the Barriers for Africa; in Cancun, End Agricultural Protectionism.” The Washington Times 29 Aug. 2003: A23.

“Rx for Trade Policy.” The Washington Times 19 Oct. 2005: A19.

Sam, Corinne. “World Trade Organization Caught in the Middle: Are TEDS the Only Way Out? .” Environmental Law 29.1 (1999): 185.

Sauvé, Pierre, and Robert M. Stern, eds. Gats 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institutuion, 2000.

“Second Thoughts on Free Trade.” The New York Times 6 January 2004.

Storer, Paul. “A Trading Nation: Canadian Trade Policy from Colonialism to Globalization.” American Review of Canadian Studies 34.1 (2004): 144+.

Summers, Lawrence H. “America Overdrawn: The U.S. Economy Is the World’s Economic Engine. but” Foreign Policy July-Aug. 2004: 46+.

Taussig, F. W. Free Trade, the Tariff and Reciprocity. New York: Macmillan, 1980.

Taylor, Lawrence D. “NAFTA in the Fresh Millennium.” American Review of Canadian Studies 34.1 (2004): 171+.

Weston, Ann. “Success and Failures Both Mark Doha.” Canadian Speeches Nov.-Dec. 2001: 55+.

“Which Way? Free Trade or Protection.” Challenge 37.1 (1994): 17+.

The most recent example is “Baby Bob“, a very short-lived 2002 sitcom starring a talking man-baby character that had starred in a series of ads for FreeInternet.com. Although the high-profile company died after the infamous dotcom crash, the talking baby emerged unscathed with his own CBS sitcom, “Baby Bob.” When the network cancelled the display after only nine episodes, Bob emerged one more time to star in a series of TV commercials for Quiznos Subs. In 2007, he was even too creepy for Quiznos and his character was pulled from all further ads. But, don’t feel too sorry for Bob. He serene has his believe web page on the Quiznos site.

From a critic’s standpoint, “Baby Bob” serves as additional proof that what has worked in the 30-second ad format has been difficult to sustain in a remarkable longer sitcom or motion describe format.

Of course, there are exceptions to every rule.

Jim Varney’s quick-witted “Hey Vern!” character, Ernest P. Worrell, not only translated well into a children’s television show, but also became a successful series on the big screen.

In 1980, a Nashville-based advertising agency, Carden & Cherry, cast struggling droll actor Jim Varney as Ernest P. Worrell in a series of Southern regional TV ads for a variety of products. His Ernest character was a talkative nosy neighbor whose catchphrase was “know whut I mean? ” The ads caught on and the Ernest P. Worrell character then began appearing in various commercials across the country. In 1988, CBS brought “Hey, Vern! It’s Ernest!” to their Saturday children’s television line-up. Although the series lasted only a year, the Ernest P. Worrell character next made a successful transition to the big screen, starring in a series of profitable low-budget movie comedies including “Ernest Goes to Camp”, “Ernest Saves Christmas”, and six others.

The California Raisins also transitioned to children’s television, in their case, a cell-animated series. They made their debut as a claymation-animated Motown-style singing group in a 1987 commercial for the California Raisin Advisory Board. Like Ernest, their TV series only lasted a year. However, their ancillary merchandise still continues to sell.

The Max Headroom character took the opposite route from the prior mentioned characters. He began as a cyberpunk protagonist in a 1984 British television movie. In 1987, Max Headroom came to the States as an ABC television series. Despite a strong cult following, it only lasted fourteen episodes. After the show was cancelled, Max appeared in a series of highly successful commercials for Coca-Cola.

SOURCES:

“Gauging viewer tastes”, Stuart Elliot, New York Times, URL: (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/16/business/media/16adco.html? _r=1&oref=slogin)

“Who Owns Your Great Idea? “, Noreen O’Leary, Adweek, URL: (http://www.adweek.com/aw/national/article_display.jsp? vnu_content_id=1003556825)

“Why advertising’s cavemen are going totally Hollyrock? “, Brooks Barnes and Suzanne Vranica, Wall Street Journal, URL: (http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117305670677226518-GDYgRU6JmWO40cfjfFMEDLLE_DM_20070311.html)

“Caveman Chic”, Ramin Setoodeh, Newsweek, URL: (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17887559/site/newsweek/)

http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2006/06/quiznos_finally.html

“Look who’s hawking”, Seth Stevenson, Slate, URL: (http://www.slate.com/id/2112786/)

“Advergaming”, David Radd, Business Week, URL: (http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/oct2006/id20061011_567417.htm? chan=innovation_game+room_top+stories)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_P._Worrell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Raisin

“Max Headroom”, Henry Jenkins, Museum of Broadcasting Communications, URL: (http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/M/htmlM/maxheadroom/maxheadroom.htm)

There are several classic car auto insurance carriers that are available on the Internet, both for quotes and the buy of auto insurance policies. The policies offered by these carriers may be more capable for classic cars than those offered by aged insurance companies. Hagerty is a classic car network that offers many different services for classic car owners, including classic car auto insurance.

Another classic car auto insurance carrier is American Collectors Insurance, which is said to be the leading provider of classic auto insurance and collectibles insurance in the United States. This company, and others like it, will work out and agreed value on a car with the insured. What this does is allows a classic car collector to maintain a classic car in perfect condition, or restore it perfect condition, with the knowledge that his or her investment will be protected by that individual’s insurance company. In difference, many standard insurance companies will simply work out what they determined to be the blue book value of a car, whether it is classic or not, which may cut the value of a classic car owners claim in the event something were to happen to his or her car.

Although classic car auto insurance can be more difficult to find at times than traditional auto insurance, there are companies that specialize in class car auto insurance. While a person may be able to acquire classic car auto insurance through a traditional broker, it may be obedient for a person to research what is available online prior to committing to one insurance company. By using the Internet, a person can find classic car auto insurance through specialized dealers who understand what a person seeking this type of insurance really needs.

Allstate Teen Insurance
Allstate has a great teen driver program, which focuses on a parent-teen driving contract. The parent and the teen decide on agreements for clear actions, like talking on a cellphone while driving and having a curfew, space limits on these actions (or ban them altogether), and finally make consequences if the teen driver breaks any part of the contract. Allstate insurance has taken a great initiative with teen driving safety, and their website http://www.allstateteendriver.com outlines all of their efforts to keep teens safe.

Statefarm Teen Insurance
Statefarm offers two stout opportunities for students to save on car insurance. The first is the ‘Good Student Discount’, which rewards students who get reliable grades by reducing the auto insurance cost. This is a great incentive because, for students with lower grades, it is beneficial motivation to increase grades if they are paying for their insurance, and for students with higher grades, it’s a greater incentive to preserve up the good work. Another highlight of auto insurance for teenagers at Statefarm is the Steer Clear Favorable Driver Discount, which is also pointed towards students. It is an extra refresher course that, when completed, gives an extra discount to those 25 and under. The course can be completed with a kit, on a computer, or even on the iPhone.

Progressive Teen Insurance
Besides offering an online directory with information on auto insurance for teens, Progressive also offers student discounts when applicable. In the online directory, Progressive befriend walk teenagers through the insurance process, explaining each step. Also, they give tips on safe driving and keeping your cool. For example, one page offers tips on how to avoid road rage and unruffled yourself down when it inevitably happens. Another page explains all of the information needed in order to get a quote and figure out how grand the auto insurance will cost for the teenager. Specifically, besides the general student benefits, Progressive doesn’t add any special features or benefits for their auto insurance for teenagers

Liberty Mutual Teen Insurance
Liberty Mutual is very straightforward on its website, http://www.libertymutualteendriving.com, on explaining what a teen and their parent can do to make sure they get the best teen auto insurance value. Liberty Mutual also offers student advantages, where if a student has good grades, they can get up to a 35% discount on their insurance. The amount of the discount varies depending on the grades of the teenager. Liberty Mutual insurance also tells all the specific ways a teenager can save on auto insurance, which is very helpful to have in one condensed area.

Geico Teen Insurance
Geico is yet another student-rewarding insurer, offering discounts for taking a driver’s education class and getting honorable grades. If the teen driver took a driver’s education class, then they are eligible for a discount on their auto insurance. Also, if they get a B-average or higher, they receive another discount. Geico does not offer any other specific teen benefits or tips, meaning the only thing that could make Geico the best teen auto insurance choice is the price of the insurance.

You have the information now; use it to figure out which insurance plans and benefits are legal for your teenager, ensuring their safety and saving as much money as possible.

Philip Reed, Auto Insurance for Teenage Drivers, Edmunds.com.
Geico, Geico.com, Geico.
Progressive, Progressive.com, Geico.com.
Liberty Mutual, libertymutual.com.com, Liberty Mutual.
Allstate, Allstate.com, Allstate.com.

Based on your salary and the amount of coverage you elect, DI coverage will allow monetary relief payable to you in the instance you are disabled either short or long term and is coverage you maintain even if you purchase the policy through your employer. Therefore, if you leave your job due to illness or disease or are receiving Workers Compensation due to an injury on the job, you can still receive your DI benefits.

Most major insurance companies (State Farm, Allstate, etc) offer this type of coverage, so whether or not you like the AFLAC duck or your employer does not participate in a plan, you can still get a disability income protection policy.

Credit Life insurance is normally connected to a specific loan (ie; auto or home). Nearly every loan out there offers credit life and/or disability insurance that will kick in and pay your brand in the instance of disability or will pay off the imprint in the occurrence of death.

Advantage: Although your note will increase by the amount of premium, you don’t have to worry about this particular bill in the instance of death or disability.

Disadvantage: As the principle of the loan decreases, so does the face amount of the policy without a change in premium.

In most cases, it is wiser to purchase a Term Life policy to cover the face amount and length of loan – especially on a long-term loan such as a mortgage. This diagram, if your mortgage starts out at $100,000 for 20yrs and your policy is a 20yr level term for $100,000 as the principle of your mortgage goes down—your policy remains the same, leaving everything extra to your beneficiary.

For short term loans (auto, signature, etc) adding this protection can mean the difference between maintaining your good credit and filing bankruptcy. Even credit cards offer some type of credit life and/or disability protection.

Accidental Death and Dismemberment insurance is the type of insurance often connected to a checking and/or savings yarn and pays a death serve only in the instance of accidental means. It is usually pretty cheap and provides a shrimp extra coverage for pennies. However, this is not the type of insurance to rely on to protect your family’s income in the instance of your death.

If all these types of insurance (life, health, disability, auto, home, flood, etc) serve only to confuse or frustrate you, visit your local insurance professional. He or she can clarify everything and guide you in purchasing adequate protection for your family.

Remember the bible talks about “getting your house in order” and insurance protection is one way to do this.

Access to Auto Insurance Quotes

According to the California Department of Insurance, the state of California passed Assembly Bill 2677 in 2004, which requires all insurance companies operating within the state to give customers access to quotes or estimates at the lowest rate available to them. This means that California auto insurance laws ensure that consumers accept accurate information when shopping for insurance policies.

AB 2677 mandates that insurance companies provide either a toll-free telephone number or a web site at which consumers can obtain those quotes. In California, the insurance company must provide the consumer with a “cost estimate of its lowest priced personal auto policy at the limits the consumer requests and for which the consumer is eligible.” This makes it illegal for insurance companies to overcharge customers when customers could be getting the same coverage for a lower rate.

Consumer Privacy

Auto insurance laws in California protect consumer privacy by limiting the information brokers and agents can disclose to third parties. Generally, any non-public information is protected, which means that insurance companies can’t employ information they have collected in an unauthorized manner. This includes health information; for example, if you are in a car accident, the auto insurance company can’t disclose details of your condition without consent.

Broker Fee Requirements

In California, auto insurance laws also protect consumers from unscrupulous broker fees, and they require insurance companies to disclose all fees prior to signing contracts or accepting payment from consumers. If you know of any insurance company, agent, or broker charging unscrupulous fees, it is primary to converse the Department of Insurance with the details.

California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan

California’s auto insurance laws provide the California Automobile Assigned Risk Thought, which is intended for consumers who are unable to accumulate insurance the standard scheme. In other words, if you’ve had too many citations or accidents, normal car insurance companies might not extend a policy to you. In this case, you have access to the CAARP, which will attach you an insurance company with pre-determined rates.

Capping

It is illegal in California for auto insurance companies to refer consumers to legal representatives in exchange for a “finder’s fee.” Capping is a felony in the state of California, so know that you don’t have to take a referral from an insurance agent or broker when you need the assistance of good counsel.

Auto insurance laws in California are detailed at the California Department of Insurance web site. Understanding your rights can protect you from unscrupulous agents and brokers, and will allow you to make informed decisions about your insurance needs.

Sources:

“Auto Premium Quote,” California Department of Insurance.

“Privacy of Nonpublic Personal Information,” California Department of Insurance.

“Broker Fee Regulations Summary,” California Department of Insurance.